Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin in Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin have been used to treat patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, evidence on the safety and efficacy of these therapies is limited. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-group, controlled trial involving hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed Covid-19 who were receiving either no supplemental oxygen or a maximum of 4 liters per minute of supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive standard care, standard care plus hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 400 mg twice daily, or standard care plus hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 400 mg twice daily plus azithromycin at a dose of 500 mg once daily for 7 days. The primary outcome was clinical status at 15 days as assessed with the use of a seven-level ordinal scale (with levels ranging from one to seven and higher scores indicating a worse condition) in the modified intention-to-treat population (patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19). Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 667 patients underwent randomization; 504 patients had confirmed Covid-19 and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. As compared with standard care, the proportional odds of having a higher score on the seven-point ordinal scale at 15 days was not affected by either hydroxychloroquine alone (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 2.11; P = 1.00) or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.73; P = 1.00). Prolongation of the corrected QT interval and elevation of liver-enzyme levels were more frequent in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azithromycin, than in those who were not receiving either agent. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with mild-to-moderate Covid-19, the use of hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azithromycin, did not improve clinical status at 15 days as compared with standard care. (Funded by the Coalition Covid-19 Brazil and EMS Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04322123.).

Decreased Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Older Adults with Bipolar Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Decreased levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) have been found in adult patients with bipolar disorder (BD) compared with a comparison group, yet there are no data specifically examining this in geriatric patients. The objective of this study was to examine whether euthymic late-life BD patients have lower BDNF levels than healthy comparators. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinics at the University of Pittsburgh and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Toronto). PARTICIPANTS: Older patients with BD (age ≥50 years, N = 118) and similarly aged healthy comparators (N = 76). There were both BD type I (N = 91) and type II (N = 27) patients. MEASUREMENTS: Serum BDNF levels were assessed in BD patients and healthy comparators. RESULTS: We found lower levels of BDNF in patients with BD than in healthy comparators (9.0 ± 6.2 versus 12.3 ± 8.9 pg/µg, t(192) = -3.01, p = 0.002), which remained even after controlling for age, sex, lithium use, and site (F(1,176) = 4.32, p = 0.039). This decrease was found specifically in patients with BD type I (8.0 ± 5.5 versus 12.3 ± 8.9 pg/µg, t(165) = 3.7, Bonferroni p < 0.001), but not type II (12.0 ± 7.5 versus 12.3 ± 8.9 pg/µg, t(101) = 0.14, Bonferroni p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with BD have lower serum levels of BDNF compared with similarly aged comparators. These effects appear to be specific to patients with BD type I. Future studies are needed to investigate the impact of reduced BDNF levels on cognition, mood, and other aspects of BD throughout the life course.